Tag Archive for 'gizmodo'

Gizmodo’s editor-in-chief interviewed by the NYT

You know, a while ago, there was this whole lost iPhone story. Now, Brian Lam wants to educate us: there’s humanity in this story. There might also be sex in it (this is a Steve Jobs’ quote, not a weird porn link). Brian Lam is Gizmodo’s editor-in-chief. This is an excerpt from his NYT interview.

There were some very contentious internal debates about writing about Gray Powell, who lost the phone. We struggled trying to decide whether to write this story. In the end, it became a story about a guy who made a very normal mistake that we’ve all done before and it added humanity to the entire story of the phone. The phone was just a thing, a simple part of the equation; it was important to show the humanity of it, too. It reminds me of an old set of keys that recently sold at an auction for over $100,000. To some people they just look like keys, but the back story is that they were the keys to a binocular case on the Titanic that a night watchman who was switching shifts forgot to hand to another watchman. They were just keys, but the fact that this simple human mistake played a pivotal role in the Titanic made it a fascinating human interest story.

[Source]

Gizmodo’s iPod Nano 5th Gen review wrap up; should you get a Nano?

So the big question: Should you buy the Nano? Yes, if you want an easy-to-use, slick, full-featured and small PMP. Especially yes if you’re also considering a cheap pocket camcorder. If you’ve got last year’s Nano and you have an interest in decent video quality, better to spend the money on a Kodak Zi8 (or the newly discounted Zi6). Or just wait for the iPod Touch to get a camera—now that’s an upgrade. The camera alone isn’t worth $150 or $180 if you’ve already got every other feature—maybe that’s the reason Jobs himself said it was “free.”

Gizmodo is always just, I trust them.

Posted via web from Ulysse’s stream

Gizmodo has intel, World, iTablet will be released

Ah… The iTablet.

Gizmodo, one of the most famous gadget/gizmo blog in the world has Intel. Read the story.

Despite the rumors, I never fully believed the Apple tablet was real, until I heard these words over my phone: “Hey, it’s [redacted]. I may or may not have sat in some Apple meetings for the tablet.”

I was driving, and swerved a little bit, even though both hands were on the wheel. Someone honked at me.

“What was that?”

They repeated themselves.

I switched on Bluetooth and pulled over to the side of the road to hear the story. You see, earlier in the day I’d given my phone number out to someone who sent me a cryptic email wanting to talk Apple. This must have been them. (Later on I verified to a high level of certainty that they were in the position to have access to the information and after talking to them for over an hour, I believe them to the same level of certainty.)

“The device, which I’ve held mock ups of, is going to have a 10 inch screen, and when I saw it looked just like a giant iPhone, with a black back— although that design could change at any time” they said, “with the same black resin back, and the familiar home button.” That’s obvious.

“But it will come in two editions, one with a webcam and one for educational use.”

Educational use?

They continued to explain the device as something that would sit between an iPod/iPhone and a MacBook, and would cost $700 to $900—”More than twice as much as a netbook,” he said.

To make up for that cost and make the device more than just a big iPod there was, this person claimed, there was talk of making the device act as a secondary screen/touchpad for iMacs and MacBooks, much like a few of the USB screens that have come out in recent months from Chinese companies. Very interesting.

They went on to say that although the project has been going on under various names between four and six years, the first prototype was built around the end of 2008. Adding, “The time to market from first prototype is generally 6-9 months.” That would place the device’s release date in this holiday season. They then said, “There was a question of what OS the device would run, too.” (Other people I’ve talked to have implied this remains a huge secret.)

My call dropped on some windy road off Skyline Drive. Fucking AT&T.

Later, I asked, was there a code name for the project?

“Yes…[redacted].”

I thought about it for a second, googled the term, and it all made sense.

“Don’t publish that name, please,” they requested.

Don’t worry, I won’t.

I believe what Brian says. What [redacted] says, too. The codename? I guess the codename won’t be something like Revolution, Domination or some great word, but something trickier… I don’t know. If it all made sense when he googled it, it means it’s not something you realize when you hear it, on the first time. Ah. I love this kind of riddles.